Areas of
agreement/disagreement/interdependencies. Establish team rules,
roles.Identify requirements for CT task accomplishment (e.g., terms of
reference, interfaces necessary, collaborative roles of those involved,
subject knowledge needed, methods of operating, milestones to manage time).
CONCEPTS OF CASE STUDIES, WORKSHOPS AND EXERCISES
·
Begin with
essential, current background context prefaces, using real world scenarios.
·
Fellows will be
placed into seminar teams, following lectures to work collaboratively as
multilateral/multinational coordinating and planning teams.
·
Small-group
discussions, assessments, analyses, and next steps briefings will be guided by
flexible APCSS facilitators.
·
Faculty will
ensure seminar Fellows understand lecture prefaces and thereafter practice skills that apply knowledge gained.
·
Specific CT
practitioner skills will include:
o
Forming
coordinating and planning teams
o
Developing and
executing comprehensive CT strategies addressing likely and possible terrorism
threats of today and tomorrow. Included are:
§
Offensive – to
deter, degrade capability/intent
§
Defensive – to
prevent (preempt), respond to attack
§
Core – to
diminish root causes of violent extremism, terrorist acts (de-legitimize)
·
APCSS will
examine CT security-issues fully, considering all applicable perspectives,
emphasizing factual analyses, conclusions and recommendations.
COURSE STRUCTURE
The three
week course is divided into five distinct, but related parts:
Part
I. Identifying and building the Global “CT” community of interest and
expertise.
Part I is comprised of the administrative in-processing of Fellows. It is
during this part that the process of building a “CT” community of interest
begins. Fellows are introduced to the Asia Pacific Center, College of Security
Studies, CSRT Program, the faculty and each other. Topic highlights include:
Portal
introductions (APCSS and APCSC)
Polling Exercise
During
Part I, Fellows participate in real-time polling with turning point software.
This polling effort provides a baseline for knowledge level, and experience of
the Fellows attending CSRT 08-1.
Part
II: Assessing the Challenge.
The thematic focus of Part II is assessing the challenge. What is terrorism?
How do is it defined? What are the dominant characteristics? How has it
evolved? Part II commences with a definitional lecture that includes a review
of the evolution of terrorism, leading up to the 21st century. This
lecture sets the baseline for a follow on CT threat assessment which requires
Fellows to assess the current threat in Asia Pacific and other major geographic
areas. Upon completion of the definitional exercise event, and regional
assessments, Fellows “step back” and explore the strategic, i.e., complex nature
of the problem, including causal loop analyses of specific terrorism
challenges. This introduction to complex problem solving within the terrorism
arena, and accompanying causal loop analyses, requires Fellows to look at
terrorism broadly as a complex problem, not just a tactical threat. Activity
based learning events during this part include:
-
Definition & evolution of terrorism (Fellows participate in definitional
exercise)
-
Regional assessments (Fellows conduct sub regional assessments)
-
Complex Problem Solving (Fellows complete causal loop exercises)
Part
III. Formulating the Response.
After assessing the challenge, the course focus shifts to formulating effective
responses options. What are the strategic framing issues necessary for a
coherent, effective response at the national, regional and global levels? The
discussion begins with an introduction to the legal frameworks within which a
comprehensive strategy may be developed. The legal policy adopted by a
government (criminal justice approach vs. law of armed conflict approach or
combination of both) will impact significantly, a government’s comprehensive
strategy. Fellows are then introduced to the components of a comprehensive
strategy, with a significant focus on intelligence. Having established the
legal framework and discussed the overall strategy; topical focus shifts to the
“supporting cast” necessary to implement and affect the strategy---e.g., we
look at the intra-governmental [national] agencies, intergovernmental [regional]
organizations and global assistance (UN) available in the development and
execution of a comprehensive strategy. After identification and discussion of
the available players, topic focus shifts to the STRATCOM/Public diplomacy
aspect of the terrorism challenge. Specifically, Fellows are exposed to the
extremist/radicalized message of many terror groups, and how the governmental
players implementing a comprehensive strategy, might address and respond to this
message (battle of hearts and mind). This is accomplished through a
presentation on deradicalization (countering the extremist message) and a panel
discussion by government [public diplomacy] and media representatives. Key
topics and activities include:
-
Legal
perspectives (Fellows participate in real time polling & discussion)
-
Comprehensive Strategy
-
Intelligence
-
Intra
governmental players and process
-
Inter
governmental players and process
-
De-radicalization
-
Public Diplomacy
Part
IV: Trends & Challenges.
In Part IV, the course shifts from strategic framing issues to strategies and
tactics of terror groups including: “battlefields”/domains in which the war on
terrorism is being waged. Part IV begins with an assessment of the maritime
domain and the virtual domain (cyber terrorism). Two full days, including
computer centric exercises/activity based learning, are spent on the varied uses
of the internet by terrorist groups. Topic highlights and exercises include:
-
Maritime Domain
-
Cyber
terrorism (Fellows participate in two cyber terrorism exercises)
-
WMD/WME
-
Suicide bombings
-
Transnational terrorist financing
-
Transnational Crime: narcotics, small arms, money laundering
At this
point in the course faculty and fellows have discussed definitions and evolution
of the threat, and conducted a current, real world assessment of the threat.
Fellows also have discussed important framing issues for strategy development
and implementation, including legal frameworks, the importance of intelligence
and public diplomacy. Additionally, Fellows have been exposed to and discussed
critical players/agencies in the process at the nation state, regional and
international levels, and the public diplomacy component in terms of
radicalization and the war of ideas. At this point, Fellows are introduced to
the major terror groups/movements within Asia Pacific:
-
Al
Qaeda and affiliates
-
Jemaah Islamiyah
-
LTTE
-
Central Asia
-
COIN
Part
V: Strategy Application and MOEs.
Part V, the final phase of the course includes three related themes: strategy
formulation (DIME, MIDLIFE--whole of government approach), measures of
effectiveness (how do we measure the effectiveness of our strategies) and
finally practice through participation in a two day capstone exercise event that
brings together all of the aforementioned topics and themes. Post course
polling is conducted to determine attitude changes, knowledge & skill gains.
-
Strategy formulation and application
-
Measures of effectiveness
-
Pacifica exercise (Fellows participate in capstone game)
-
Post
course survey (Fellows participate in real time polling)
The
discussion above focuses on the thematic building blocks that form the CSRT
resident course structure. Throughout the course, a series of “blended learning
events” will be offered. These include:
CSRT
LEARNING MODEL
Fellows are expected to
actively participate in the CSRT Curriculum, which employs four distinct forms
of learning: readings, lectures, seminar discussions, and exercises.
·
Fellows complete
required reading assignments, which provide a general overview of topics in the
curriculum. Additional recommended readings provide further perspectives on core
topics.
·
Lectures provide
professional insights from subject matter experts and set the stage for seminar
discussions and the final gaming exercise.
·
Small group
seminars, guided by a facilitator, provide Fellows the opportunity to discuss
individual topics, linking academic insights with professional experience.
·
Course exercises
are “learn by doing” interactive events that challenge Fellows to apply security
concepts and strategies to simulated scenarios.
All aspects of the CSRT Course
embody three important characteristics: transparency, non-attribution, and
mutual respect. Transparency provides an academic environment of openness where
all issues can be examined, debated, and discussed. To promote candor and open
discussion, the College of Security Studies has a policy of non-attribution,
which is binding on all who attend the CSRT Course. Comments and opinions
expressed by anyone participating in the course will not be attributed to the
speaker by name to non-participants without the speaker's prior approval. All
interaction among the Fellows is done in a spirit of mutual respect in
recognition of the tremendous diversity of nations represented in the course in
terms of size, geography, culture, history, political system, and state of
economic development.
Click here for Admissions
information (text only)